Garcia V. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Case Brief

Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Divorce Divorces

Garcia V. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Case Brief. 528 (1985), is a landmark united states supreme court decision in which the court held that the congress has the. Web a public mass transit authority that received substantial federal funding, brought action for declaratory judgment to determine whether it was entitled to u.s.

528 (1985), is a landmark united states supreme court decision in which the court held that the congress has the. Web the secretary counterclaimed under 29 u.s.c. On the same day that samta filed its action,. Web the san antonio metro transit authority (samta) (defendant) had previously paid its state employees according to the federal standards established in the flsa, but ceased. The san antonio metropolitan transit authority (samta), the main provider of transportation in the san antonio metropolitan area, claimed it was exempt. The wage and hour administration of the federal department of labor determined that the san antonio metropolitan transit authority was subject to the minimum wage and. 217 for enforcement of the overtime and recordkeeping requirements of the flsa. San antonio metropolitan transit authority, 469 u.s. Web despite a number of attempts to clarify the meaning of these tests, no clear lines had been established at the time of garcia.on the surface, garcia seemed to present the question. San antonio metropolitan transit authority case brief at.

217 for enforcement of the overtime and recordkeeping requirements of the flsa. The district court has stayed that action pending the outcome of these cases, but it allowed garcia to intervene in the present. Web a public mass transit authority that received substantial federal funding, brought action for declaratory judgment to determine whether it was entitled to u.s. San antonio metropolitan transit authority case brief at. Web despite a number of attempts to clarify the meaning of these tests, no clear lines had been established at the time of garcia.on the surface, garcia seemed to present the question. San antonio metropolitan transit authority, 469 u.s. The wage and hour administration of the federal department of labor determined that the san antonio metropolitan transit authority was subject to the minimum wage and. The san antonio metropolitan transit authority (samta), the main provider of transportation in the san antonio metropolitan area, claimed it was exempt. Web facts of the case. Web the san antonio metro transit authority (samta) (defendant) had previously paid its state employees according to the federal standards established in the flsa, but ceased. Web the secretary counterclaimed under 29 u.s.c.